The Happiest Day Of Your Life
The extraordinary affairs unfolding around HRH the Prince of Wales and the marriage to his mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles lurch from parlous calamity to farce. Because both are divorcees and with Charles being future head of Church of England, it was untenable that they would be allowed to wed in a church so a hastily arranged civil ceremony was arranged to held in one of the Queens country piles in Windsor. However it came to light that if the rooms in Windsor were used for a civil ceremony that would enable any commoner to do so; an idea that the incumbent monarch quickly scotched.
So a switch of venue was hurriedly arranged across the road in Windsor Guildhall where it was subsequently discovered that the great unwashed had a legal right to witness the ceremony, an altogether distasteful thought for the newly-weds.
Worse was to follow. Eminent constitutional historians began to question the legality of the union altogether. According to the 1836 Marriage Act, Parliament had decreed that no member of the British Royal Family could be wed in a civil ceremony, an act that was only amended in 1949 and is open to some disputation as to whether it removed the said impediment.
This led to the edifying spectacle in the House of Commons last week of the Home Secretary claiming that the nuptials should go ahead because of the Human Rights Act, passed by Strasbourg, guaranteed that no let or hinderance should be placed on a couple's right to marry
One can't help but feel that they're both getting what they bloody well deserve (for once the majority of the British public agree with me) and why don't they just bugger off back to Highgrove (Charles country residence), live in sin and hire a new public relations officer...









